Oregon laws on dating a minor dating tipa
[1971 c.743 §104; 1975 c.461 §1; 1977 c.844 §1; 1979 c.744 §7; 1983 c.500 §1; 1999 c.949 §1] Note: Legislative Counsel has substituted “chapter 743, Oregon Laws 1971,” for the words “this Act” in section 104, chapter 743, Oregon Laws 1971, compiled as 163.305.
[1971 c.743 §113; 1989 c.359 §3] 163.405 Sodomy in the first degree.(2)When criminality depends on the child’s being under a specified age other than 16, it is an affirmative defense for the defendant to prove that the defendant reasonably believed the child to be above the specified age at the time of the alleged offense.(3) In any prosecution under ORS 163.355 to 163.445 in which the victim’s lack of consent is based solely upon the incapacity of the victim to consent because the victim is mentally defective, mentally incapacitated or physically helpless, it is an affirmative defense for the defendant to prove that at the time of the alleged offense the defendant did not know of the facts or conditions responsible for the victim’s incapacity to consent.[1981 c.549 §3; 1989 c.359 §6; 1991 c.386 §2] 163.412 Exceptions to unlawful sexual penetration prohibition.Nothing in ORS 163.408 or 163.411 prohibits a penetration described in either of those sections when: (1)The penetration is part of a medically recognized treatment or diagnostic procedure; or (2)The penetration is accomplished by a peace officer or a corrections officer acting in official capacity, or by medical personnel at the request of such an officer, in order to search for weapons, contraband or evidence of crime.